Field-based decision validation for critical cross-border commitments — technology partnerships, market entries, strategic suppliers.
One question answered clearly: Should you do this deal at all?
Contracts lock in expectations. Teams lock in narratives. Reversals become expensive. The moment a deal closes, the cost of being wrong compounds — not in projections, but in execution reality.
AI summarizes markets. Advisors optimize execution. But the upstream question — "Should we do this deal at all?" — rarely has a structured answer before signature. That gap is what this engagement addresses.
Entering a new market or locking a long-term technology relationship when local reality cannot be verified remotely.
Evaluating a strategic partner or critical supplier — where execution capability matters more than credentials.
Validating operational assumptions before committing to a technology partnership or regional expansion.
When documents and calls aren’t enough to verify operational reality, incentives, and accountability.
For engagements where the decision is Proceed — but execution risk remains between parties. Alignment design, accountability framework, and execution structure clarification. Compensation disclosed. This is not brokerage.
15–30 min. Understanding your situation, decision stage, and fit. Not a sales call.
5–10 business days. Remote structural analysis. Clarifies what is actually being decided.
Only if required. Scoped to the assumption that cannot be resolved remotely.
Proceed, Pause, or Stop — with a clear structural rationale.
Clarity on scope protects both sides. If the following describes your current need, a different engagement is a better fit.
Submit your decision context. If it fits our scope (pre-commitment validation), we will respond within 48 hours.